Apr 292011

Anachronaeon is a two-man band from Sweden consisting of Andreas Åkerlind on drums and Patrik Carlsson providing guitars, bass, vocals, and keys. We first heard their music last summer on a tip from our blog-bro Niek at Death Metal Baboon (yes, it seems we’re destined to mention DMB in every post we run this week), and we then featured the band in one of our MISCELLANY posts last August (here).

Yesterday we got an e-mail from Patrik Carlsson telling us that Anachronaeon have recorded a cover of “Wasting Love” by Iron Maiden, which the band are making available for free download. I took a deep breath when I saw that, (a) because I love the original Maiden version of “Wasting Love” (despite the clean singing), and (b) because I couldn’t imagine what Anachronaeon would do to the song, given the band’s own musical style — which is a dark fusion of melodic black- and death-metal.

And right after that deep breath came a rush of thoughts about song covers in general — how rarely they succeed, and how “success” should be defined and measured. After the jump, those thoughts (on which we’d like to see your comments) plus Iron Maiden’s official video for “Wasting Love” and Anachronaeon’s cover.

Song covers that just faithfully reproduce an original song don’t add anything. Why would anyone listen to a reproduction when you can listen to the original? That point seems inarguable. So, if a cover needs to be different from the original to be worth hearing, what makes a cover succeed and what makes it fail?

I think the answer depends to some extent on the popularity of the original song and how you, as a listener, feel about it. If it’s a great song, a well-remembered song, the kind of song that welcomingly unfolds in your head as soon as you hear the first few notes, then a band that alters that song in a cover is playing with fire. I think for a cover of that kind of song to work, the cover band almost has to change it dramatically. Making minor alterations around the edges can be jarring — you mind is playing one thing in your head from memory, and here and there the cover recording is doing something else that you’re unlikely to hear as an improvement on the original.

On the other hand, changing a beloved original song in dramatic ways can be equally off-putting — or it can be a wonderful surprise. It all depends on whether the cover song can stand on its own as something interestingly different, on whether the cover band has found something in the original that it can run with, maintaining a connection to the original but spinning out a variation that can stand on its own two legs as a good piece of music. There’s no formula for how to do this.

Two covers I’ve heard recently (and written about) jump to mind as examples of what works. One is Amon Amarth‘s cover of System of A Down‘s “Aerials”, which appeared as a bonus track on Surtur Rising (if you want to hear that song, use this link). Another is Torture Division‘s cover of a Mastodon song called “Iron Tusk” (which can be heard here). Both songs imprint the cover band’s own particular style on the original, creating something different and good, without completely losing connection with the originals.

Now we come to “Wasting Love”. It happens to be one of my favorite Maiden songs. It’s a ballad that features impassioned, vibrant clean vocals from Bruce Dickinson, a deeply memorably melody, great rhythm and lead guitar lines, and a smokin’ solo by Janick Gers, who wrote the song with Dickinson. Here’s the official video for “Wasting Love”:

This is the kind of song I mentioned above where a band attempting to cover it will be playing with fire. What has Anacrhonaeon done with the song?

Well, the cover is definitely not a reproduction and it’s definitely not tinkering around the edges, so those pitfalls have been avoided. Anachronaeon has made some significant changes, but it’s still recognizable as “Wasting Love”. The original ballad has a darkness at its core, and Anachronaeon have seized on that and amplified it, dropping the tempo of the intro passage, substituting tremolo guitar and blast-beats for the guitar arpeggios, down-tuning the guitars, and for the most part roaring the lyrics in a bestial guttural in place of Dickinson’s soaring power-metal cleans. Anachronaeon also ends the song with a relatively quiet, melancholy outro instead of Maiden’s ramped-up finish, and that’s a fitting way to end Anachronaeon’s version.

Again, the original isn’t something that can be improved upon, it can only be changed into something different that also holds up well on its own merits, and I think this tribute accomplishes that.

The one aspect of the cover that’s hanging me up a bit are the brief clean vocals. Dickinson’s memorable vocals are the key to “Wasted Love”. This is one of those examples I mentioned earlier where the mind is streaming Dickinson’s vocals and Anachronaeon is playing something quite different. Patrik Carlsson certainly doesn’t try to imitate Dickinson’s vocals; they’re subdued instead of bombastic. But I think the cover might have worked better without any clean vocals at all — just the harsh gutturals. Maybe you’ll have a different reaction. Check it out:

[audio:https://www.nocleansinging.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Wasting-Love-mp3.mp3|titles=Anachronaeon: “Wasting Love” (cover)]

To download the Anachronaeon single, which includes both .mp3 and .wav versions of the song, release notes, and cover art, right-click on the link below (we decided to host this file on our own server rather than subject you to the pop-up ads you’d get using the same Mediafire link that Patrik sent us).

Anachronaeon: Wasting Love Single

For more info about Anachronaeon, visit their official site at this location.

What do you think of cover songs? Are they worth it? If they are, what makes a cover song successful? Are there some good metal covers that popped into your head as you read this post? Leave us some comments!

  12 Responses to “THE PROS AND CONS OF COVERS”

  1. Hehe… covers are indeed tricky business, and we don’t really know what to expect from people hearing it. It’s sole creation was really a pre-production thing for the next album we’re gonna record, so we figured instead of just recording some mumbo-jumbo, why not make a cover?
    I am myself an Iron Maiden fan since childhood, so I really see it as a tribute and of course needed to do our own spin on this one (why copy perfection?). Hopefully it can be taken for what it is, and not too seriously either hehe.

  2. I think your statement that “the original isn’t something that can be improved upon, it can only be changed into something different that also holds up well on its own merits” usually sums up the fundamental issue with most cover versions.

    However, there are some (admittedly few) cases where a faithful reproduction actually does succeed — and generally I’d say this would be cases where the original song is a dramatic departure from the covering band’s normal style. Pantera’s “Planet Caravan” or Faith No More’s “Easy” (or their “I Started a Joke”) come to mind as examples of this.

    • That’s an interesting thought — covers that are faithful but unexpected. And you’ve given two great examples indeed. Here’s the Pantera cover of that Sabbath song, accompanied by some cool animation:


      And here’s Faith No More’s cover of “Easy” (originally by The Commodores):


      • To add to the “covers that don’t add much to the original but still kick ass category

        Canopy doing a live rendition of Edge of Sanity’s “Twilight”


        Twilight is probably my favorite EoS song of all times and I think they do a decent job, but who knows I might be biased 🙂

        • Yes, you are biased, which can be forgiven under the circumstances. 🙂 I, however, am not biased, and IMO that’s an awesome cover. I don’t remember that song from any of the Canopy discs. That should be a future bonus track.

          • I think that live recording is the only recording of it they ever did. I’m not aware of it existing on any other release.

            • The sound didn’t completely sync up with the video, so I thought maybe it was a rough mix of a studio recording. Oh well, maybe they can be convinced to do up a proper studio version some day. It’s a killer song to begin with, and Canopy really did it justice.

              • The un-synch I think is mostly due to youtube. We’ve played the track many times live though, as a hommage to EoS. Come to think of it, we’ve done a shitload of covers, thankfully few will ever see the light. The Twilight covers is one of the ones I like the most. Together with a song called “Possessed” by a fairly unknown band known as Non Serviam.

                I’ll post a video if we ever do that one again, 🙂

  3. I very much agree with your sentiment here, covers that add nothing or change little make me uninterested, covers that completely rape (beloved) original make you potentially hate the band. My favorite category of covers though are the not so serious covers (generally by not so serious bands) that just put a big dumb grin on my face.

    Brutal Truth’s “Wish You Were Here (and now go away)”


    Anal Cunt’s “American Woman”


    and of course perhaps the best cover of all times, “Stayin’ Alive (oi! version)”


  4. If a band doesn’t completely remake another band’s song and make it their own, what’s the point? My favourite cover has to be Fudge Tunnel’s version of “Changes” by Black Sabbath. It is probably my least favourite Sabbath song, but FT give it balls

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.